Nifty muted on a potential chaotic next-generation GST reform
·
Apart from the Trump tariff tantrum, the market is
also concerned about a potential GST chaos due to complexities and no ITC for
the 5-0% items
·
Overall weighted average GST rate would be ~12.50%
vs earlier 14.5%
·
Theoretically, GST 2.0 reform may boost 0.5% GDP
against a 0.5% drag from Trump tariffs
·
But the actual transmission of GST rate cuts to
the real economy is vital without the profiteering and bypassing attitude of
producers
·
India’s weak labor/job market and already high
cost of living may not permit additional discretionary consumer spending
meaningfully, even if there are some price cuts
On August 15, 2025, in his Independence Day speechto the nation, Indian Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi announced a
transformative "next-generation GST reforms" plan, aimed at
simplifying India's complex Goods and Services Tax (GST) structure and
stimulating economic growth after Trump imposed 25% tariffs and threatened
another 25% tariffs as ‘punishment’ for buying ‘dirty’ Russian oil and to fund
the Ukraine war. These reforms, expected to be implemented before Diwali
(October 2025), involve consolidating the current five-slab tax structure ()%, 5%,
12%, 18%, and 28+12=40%) into a streamlined four-slab system (0%, 5%, 18% and
40%), with a special 40% rate for luxury and sin goods & service like
tobacco and online gaming. The so-called
sin/luxury GST was already 40% if we consider the additional 12% cess on top of
28%.
On September 3, 2025, as highly expected, the 56th
GST Council meeting was held in New Delhi under Union Finance Minister Nirmala
Sitharaman. It approved the implementation of GST 2.0 from September 22, an auspicious
‘Navratri’ day, just ahead of the Diwali festival shopping season. India’s
Goods and Services Tax (GST) reform, termed GST 2.0, effective from September
22, 2025, represents a significant overhaul of the indirect tax system
introduced in 2017. The reform simplifies the tax structure, reduces rates on
essentials, and aims to boost consumption, ease compliance, and foster economic
growth.
The GST 2.0 reform simplifies the tax structure,
reduces rates on essentials, and aims to boost consumption, ease compliance,
and foster economic growth. Approximately 99% of items in the 12% slab will
move to 5%, and 90% of items in the 28% slab will shift to 18%. Compensation
cess, previously levied on luxury and demerit goods, will be eliminated by
March 31, 2026, creating fiscal space for rate rationalization. The overall
weighted average rates should be around 12.5% if we consider 60% of items are
in 5%, 30% are in 18% and 10% are in 40% GST category. The current average
weighted GST rate is around 14.5%.
Key GST
Rate Changes- Simplified Tax Structure: Replaced the 4-tier GST structure with
a 3-tier system.
·
Standard Rate:
18%
·
Merit Rate: 5%
·
Special De-merit
Rate: 40% for select goods (e.g., pan masala, Gutkha, cigarettes, tobacco
products
Exemptions
for the Common Man: NIL GST on:
·
All individual
life and health insurance policies (including family floater, senior citizen
policies) and their reinsurance.
·
Ultra-High
Temperature (UHT) milk, prepackaged Chena/paneer, all Indian breads (chapatti,
roti, paratha, etc.).
·
33 lifesaving
drugs for cancer, rare diseases, and chronic conditions; 3 additional drugs
reduced from 5% to NIL
5% GST on:
·
Common items
like hair oil, shampoo, toothpaste, toothbrushes, bicycles, tableware, and kitchenware
·
Food items like
packaged nankeens, bhujia, pasta, instant noodles, chocolates, coffee,
cornflakes, butter, and ghee.
·
All other drugs
and medicines (reduced from 12%).
·
Medical
apparatus/devices (e.g., glucometers, bandages, diagnostic kits) and renewable
energy devices.
·
Tendu Leaves: Reduced
to 5% to align with tobacco leaves and support minor forest produce.
·
Renewable Energy
Devices: Reduced from 12% to 5%, with refund mechanisms for deepened inverted
duty structures.
·
Electric
vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy devices (e.g., solar cookers) retain or
move to a 5% rate
·
Marble/Granite
Blocks: Reduced from 12% to 5% as intermediate goods.
·
Spectacles/Goggles:
Vision-correcting spectacles/goggles at 5% (down from 12%/18%); others at 18%.
·
Batteries:
Uniformly taxed at 18% (lithium-ion from 18%, others from 28%).
Sector-Specific
Reductions:
·
Agriculture: GST
on tractors, agricultural machinery, and bio-pesticides reduced from 12% to 5%.
·
Labour-Intensive
Goods: Handicrafts, marble/granite blocks, intermediate leather goods reduced
from 12% to 5%
·
Textiles:
Manmade fibre and yarn GST reduced from 18%/12% to 5%, correcting the inverted
duty structure.
·
Fertilizers:
Sulphuric acid, nitric acid, ammonia reduced from 18% to 5%.
·
Automotive:
Small cars, motorcycles (≤350cc), buses, trucks, ambulances, auto parts,
three-wheelers reduced from 28% to 18%.
·
Cement: Reduced
from 28% to 18%.
·
Hotel
Accommodation: Services ≤₹7,500/day
reduced from 12% to 5%.
·
Beauty/Wellness
Services: Gyms, salons, barbers, yoga centres reduced from 18% to 5%.
Increased
Rates:
·
Pan Masala,
gutkha, cigarettes, unmanufactured tobacco, and certain beverages (e.g.,
aerated waters, caffeinated drinks) increased to 40% (subject to compensation
cess obligations); will not be implemented for some time (months) due to
payment of earlier compensation cess along with interest payment obligations.
·
Coal: Increased
to 18% from 5% plus ₹400/ton
compensation cess, merging cess into GST with no additional burden.
Implementation
Timeline
·
Effective Date:
Most changes are effective from September 22, 2025
·
Exceptions: Pan Masala,
gutkha, cigarettes, and tobacco products will retain existing rates until
compensation cess obligations are cleared, with the transition date to be
decided by the Union Finance Minister.
Trade
Facilitation Measures
·
Goods and
Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT): Operational by the end of September
2025, with hearings starting by December 2025.
·
Deadline for
filing backlog appeals: June 30, 2026.
·
Principal Bench
to serve as the National Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.
·
Process Reforms:
Detailed in Annexure-V, to be notified later.
·
Provisional
Refunds: 90% provisional refunds for inverted duty structure based on data
analysis and risk evaluation.
Other
Changes
·
Retail Sale
Price (RSP) Taxation: Applied to pan masala, gutkha, cigarettes, and tobacco
products
·
Exemptions: Ad
hoc IGST and compensation cess exemption for armored sedan cars imported by the
President’s Secretariat.
·
Restaurant
Services: Clarified that standalone restaurants cannot declare themselves as ‘specified
premises’ to pay 18% GST with ITC.
·
Valuation Rules:
Amended for lottery tickets to align with tax rate changes.
Vehicles:
·
Small cars
(petrol/LPG/CNG ≤1200cc, diesel ≤1500cc, length ≤4000mm): Reduced from 28% to
18%.
·
Mid-size/large
cars (>1500cc or >4000mm), utility vehicles (SUVs, MUVs, MPVs, XUVs with
ground clearance ≥170mm): 40% GST, no cess.
·
Three-wheelers,
buses, trucks, ambulances: Reduced from 28% to 18%.
·
Motorcycles:
≤350cc at 18%; >350cc at 40%.
·
Bicycles and
parts: Reduced from 12% to 5%.
Services
Insurance:
All individual life insurance (term, ULIP,
endowment) and health insurance (family floater, senior citizen) policies,
including reinsurance, are exempt.
Transportation:
·
Passenger
transport: 5% (no ITC) or 18% (with ITC) option.
·
Air passenger
transport: 5% for economy class, 18% otherwise; no dual-rate option.
·
Goods transport
by GTA/CTO: 5% (no ITC) or 18% (with ITC) option.
·
Multimodal
goods transport: 5% (restricted ITC) if no air transport; 18% (full ITC) if air
transport is involved.
Job Work:
·
Pharmaceutical
products and hides/skins/leather (Chapter 41): Reduced from 12% to 5% with ITC.
·
Leather
goods/footwear (Chapters 42/64) and alcoholic liquor: Remain at 18%.
·
Residuary job
work: Increased from 12% to 18%.
Hotel
Accommodation: ≤₹7,500/day
at 5% (no ITC).
·
Beauty/Wellness
Services: Health clubs, salons, barbers, fitness/yoga centres reduced from 18%
to 5% (no ITC).
·
Actionable
Claims: Lottery, betting, gambling, horse racing, casinos, and online gaming at
40%.
·
Sporting
Events: IPL admission at 40%; other events exempt if ticket ≤₹500, else 18%.
·
Oil and Gas
Works Contracts: Offshore exploration/production works contracts at 18%.
Rationale
for Non-Exemptions
·
Agricultural
Machinery, Medicines, GTA Services, and Job Work: Non-exemption maintains the ITC
chain, preventing cost increases that would arise from reversing the ITC, which
could raise prices for consumers/farmers.
·
Coal and
Carbonated Beverages: Rate increases offset the removal of compensation cess to
maintain tax incidence.
·
Textiles
(Chemical Dyes, Plastics, etc.): Rates unchanged to avoid end-use-based
exemptions, aligning with policy to simplify tax structure.
·
Technical
Textiles: Treated as textiles, not plastics, with refund mechanisms for
inverted duty structures.
·
Toilet Soap
Bars vs. Liquid Soap: Bars reduced to 5% to benefit lower-income groups; liquid
soap remains at higher rates.
·
Face
Powder/Shampoos: Reduced to 5% as daily-use items, despite benefiting luxury
brands, to simplify the tax structure.
·
Mouthwash: Not
reduced (unlike toothpaste, brushes, and floss) as it’s not considered basic
dental hygiene.
·
Raw Cotton:
Taxed on reverse charge to maintain the ITC chain for the textile industry,
benefiting consumers.
Additional
Notes
·
Special Rate
(40%): Applied to sin goods (e.g., tobacco, betting) and select luxury goods,
merging compensation cess into GST to maintain tax incidence.
·
Wood Pulp:
Differential rates reflect separate paper and textile supply chains.
·
Process
Reforms: Expedited refunds for inverted duty structures to support
manufacturers.
Ease of
Compliance:
·
Introduction of
pre-filled GST returns, automated refunds, and tech-based registration to
simplify compliance, particularly for MSMEs
·
Resolving
inverted duty structures to reduce working capital blockages and improve
manufacturing competitiveness.
·
Support for
MSMEs and Formalization: Simplified
compliance and lower tax rates reduce costs for MSMEs, encouraging
formalization of the unorganized sector and expanding the tax base.
·
Faster refunds
and pre-filled returns ease working capital constraints, enabling MSMEs to
redirect resources to growth.
Potential
Theoretical Impact on the Economy
·
Boost to
Consumption: Lower taxes on
essentials (e.g., FMCG, dairy, personal care) and aspirational goods (e.g.,
small cars, appliances) are expected to increase disposable income, driving
consumption, which accounts for ~60% of India’s GDP.
·
Savings
estimates include ₹9,000 annually on a ₹50,000 insurance premium, ₹2–3 lakh on a ₹50 lakh property (due to cement tax cuts), and ₹1,000–2,000 monthly on groceries.
·
Analysts predict
a “multiplier effect” on the economy, reigniting the “animal spirits” of
spending, especially in rural and middle-class households
Resilience
against Global Trade Disruptions:
·
GST 2.0 aims to
cushion the impact of 50% US tariffs on Indian exports by boosting domestic
demand and reducing costs for exporters
·
Sectors like
textiles, automobiles, and agriculture benefit from lower input costs and tax
inversions, enhancing competitiveness.
·
The US’s 50%
tariffs on Indian exports posed a risk to markets, but GST 2.0’s consumption
boost has limited corrections. The Nifty 50 fell only 1% in August 2025, with
consumption stocks outperforming.
·
Analyst Chris
Wood noted that GST rationalization prevented a deeper market correction by
sustaining demand momentum.
Inflation
Control: RBI may cut 50 bps in H2FY26
·
Lower GST rates
on essentials are expected to reduce consumer price inflation (already at an
eight-year low of 1.6% in July 2025). This could provide the Reserve Bank of
India (RBI) with flexibility for monetary easing
·
However, higher
taxes on sin goods (e.g., aerated beverages, tobacco) may marginally increase
prices in those categories.
Fiscal
Impact: Estimated revenue loss of ₹93,000 crore (~0.26% of GDP), reduced to ₹48,000 crore (~0.13% of GDP) after higher revenues
from the 40% slab. States will bear ~70% of the loss, but it’s still not clear whether
~₹0.50T revenue loss for the full or half year.
Increased consumption and compliance are expected to offset revenue shortfalls
in the long term, maintaining the fiscal deficit at ~4.4% of GDP for FY26.
Sectoral
Growth:
·
Healthcare: Tax
exemptions on medicines and insurance improve affordability, potentially
increasing insurance penetration (currently 3.8% of GDP)
·
Real Estate:
Lower cement taxes (28% to 18%) reduce construction costs, boosting affordable
housing and infrastructure.
·
Automobiles:
Reduced GST on small cars (28% to 18%) and EVs (retained at 5%) could revive
demand, especially for companies like Maruti Suzuki.
Long-Term
Economic Goals:
·
GST 2.0 supports
India’s Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India) initiative by enhancing
manufacturing competitiveness and reducing logistics costs.
·
Simplified
taxation and reduced disputes could improve India’s ease of doing business
ranking, attracting investment.
Positive/neutral
Market Sentiment:
Indian equity indices (Nifty, Sensex) rose over 1%
post the GST Council’s approval, reflecting optimism about consumption-driven
growth, but sizzled out amid concern over input tax credit and reality of
implementations; many cement companies already hiked price equivalent to
potential GST rate cuts later; i.e. most of the producers may be looking for
profiteering, bypassing the system/law. -
Sectors like auto, FMCG, consumer durables, and real estate saw gains of up to
6.5% in August 2025, driven by anticipated demand revival. Stocks like Maruti
Suzuki, Mahindra & Mahindra, Hindustan Unilever, and ITC. Insurance stocks
(e.g., ICICI Prudential, SBI Life, and LIC) gained 2–5% due to GST exemptions
on health and life insurance, but most of them stumbled on the concern of
non-availability of ITC under the 0% or even 5% GST slab to offset their GST
payment for various other input costs.
Sector-Specific
Impacts:
·
Consumer
Durables & FMCG: Tax cuts on appliances, soaps, and dairy products are
expected to boost demand, benefiting companies like Samsung, LG, and Hindustan
Unilever (HUL)
·
Automobiles:
Lower taxes on small cars and EVs favor Maruti Suzuki and Tata Motors,
potentially reversing the decline in small car sales (down from 50% to 33% of
the market pre-COVID).
·
Real Estate
& Cement: Reduced cement taxes support developers and cement companies
(e.g., UltraTech, Ambuja), enhancing housing affordability.
·
Healthcare &
Insurance: Tax exemptions drive growth for insurance firms and pharma companies
producing lifesaving drugs.
·
Sin Goods:
Higher taxes on tobacco and aerated beverages may pressure companies like ITC
(tobacco) and Coca-Cola/Pepsi, though their diversified portfolios may mitigate
impacts.
Earnings and
GDP Growth:
·
Analysts predict
double-digit corporate earnings growth due to increased consumption and
simplified compliance, improving valuations in consumption-driven sectors.
·
Q1FY26 GDP
growth of 7.8% and GST reforms could attract foreign institutional investors
(FIIs), supporting market stability.
Risks and
Challenges:
·
SMEs in
export-oriented sectors (e.g., textiles, diamonds) face tariff-related stress,
which could impact microfinance and consumer finance stocks
·
Higher taxes on
online gaming may dampen growth in that sector, affecting related tech firms
·
Short-term
revenue losses could create volatility if consumption growth underperforms
expectations.
·
While lower
taxes are expected to boost consumption, the initial revenue loss (₹48,000–93,000 crore) could strain state finances,
potentially leading to pushback from states in future GST Council meetings.
·
A Think Change
Forum report warns that the 40% slab for sin goods could expand over time,
undermining simplification efforts. It advocates for a single-rate GST in the
future, capped at 18%.
·
Past GST
rollouts faced technological hurdles (e.g., GSTN portal glitches), and similar
issues could arise with pre-filled returns and automated refunds, especially
for SMEs.
·
Classification
disputes (e.g., salted vs. caramel popcorn) may persist unless fully resolved,
impacting compliance costs.
·
The timing of
GST 2.0 aligns with global trade tensions, particularly US tariffs, making
domestic demand critical. The reform’s success depends on effective rate
transmission to consumers.
·
GST 2.0 is a
step toward a simpler, more transparent tax system, but analysts suggest a
single-rate GST (e.g., 18%) could further reduce distortions and litigation,
aligning with global best practices.
GST 2.0 is a transformative reform aimed at
simplifying India’s sales/consumption tax system, reducing the tax burden on
essentials, and boosting consumption. It is expected to drive economic growth
(potentially 6.5–7% GDP over two years), support MSMEs, and enhance
affordability in sectors like healthcare, automobiles, and real estate. The
stock market has responded positively, with consumption-driven sectors (FMCG,
auto, insurance) gaining, though tariff-related risks and short-term revenue
losses remain concerns. By addressing structural issues, easing compliance, and
aligning with India’s self-reliance goals, GST 2.0 could strengthen the
economy’s resilience and global competitiveness, provided implementation is smooth
and consumption growth meets expectations.
Sectors
Facing Higher Cost Pressure Due to Non-Availability of Input Tax Credit (ITC)
in Zero or 5% GST Slab under GST 2.0
Under GST 2.0, effective from September 22, 2025,
several goods and services have been moved to the zero-rated or 5% GST slab,
which typically restricts or eliminates the availability of Input Tax Credit
(ITC). This means businesses in these sectors cannot offset taxes paid on
inputs against their output tax liability, leading to higher cost pressures.
Key Context
on ITC and GST 2.0
·
Zero-Rated
Supplies: Goods and services with a 0% GST rate (e.g., education services,
certain lifesaving medicines) do not allow ITC, as no output tax is charged.
·
5% GST Slab: For
goods and services taxed at 5%, ITC is generally restricted under Section 17(5)
of the CGST Act unless specifically allowed, as the low tax rate assumes
minimal input tax recovery to keep prices affordable.
·
Impact:
Businesses in these sectors face higher input costs, as taxes paid on raw
materials, services, or capital goods (often taxed at 18% or higher) cannot be
claimed as credits, increasing the cost of production or operations.
Sectors
Likely to Face Higher Cost Pressure
Healthcare
Sector: Affected Segments
·
Manufacturers
and suppliers of lifesaving medicines (33 drugs now exempt from GST).
·
Providers of
health insurance services (GST-exempt for individual life and health insurance
policies).
·
Medical equipment
like oxygen concentrators and medical-grade oxygen (GST reduced to 5%).
·
Inputs such as
active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), packaging materials, or logistics
services are often taxed at 18%. Without ITC, manufacturers absorb these costs,
squeezing margins.
·
Health insurance
providers face non-recoverable taxes on operational inputs (e.g., IT services,
office supplies), increasing premium costs, or reducing profitability.
·
A pharmaceutical
company producing exempt lifesaving drugs cannot claim ITC on taxes paid for
APIs (18%) or manufacturing equipment, raising production costs.
·
Some firms may
pass costs to consumers via higher prices for non-exempt products or diversify
into taxable segments.
Agriculture
and Allied Sectors:
·
Manufacturers of
tractors, farm machinery, fertilizers, and drip irrigation systems (GST reduced
from 12–18% to 5%).
·
Suppliers of
certain agricultural inputs (e.g., seeds, organic manure) that may fall under
the 0% or 5% slab.
·
Inputs like
steel, plastic components, or fuel for machinery are taxed at 18%, but ITC is
restricted for 5%-rated outputs. This increases manufacturing costs for tractor
and irrigation equipment producers.
·
Fertilizer
manufacturers face similar issues with chemical inputs taxed at higher rates.
·
A tractor
manufacturer like Mahindra & Mahindra cannot claim ITC on steel or
components (18%), leading to higher production costs despite lower GST on the
final product.
·
Mitigation:
Companies may absorb costs to remain competitive or lobby for ITC eligibility
on critical inputs.
Education
Sector:
·
Providers of
education services (schools, colleges, coaching centers) and books (now fully
GST-exempt)
·
Educational
institutions incur taxes on inputs like IT infrastructure, stationery, and
facility maintenance (taxed at 18%), but cannot claim ITC due to the exempt
status of their services.
·
Publishers of
educational books face non-recoverable taxes on paper, printing, and logistics,
increasing book production costs.
·
A coaching
institute like Byju’s or a school cannot claim ITC on computers or software
subscriptions, raising operational expenses.
·
Institutions may
increase fees or rely on government subsidies to offset costs.
Food and
Beverage Sector (Essential Goods):
·
Producers of
dairy products (e.g., milk, curd), cereals (e.g., corn flakes), and essential
food items (e.g., Atta, rice) moved to 0% or 5% GST.
·
Inputs like
packaging materials, transportation, and processing equipment are taxed at 18%,
but ITC is unavailable for zero-rated or 5%-rated outputs, increasing costs.
·
Small-scale food
processors and dairy cooperatives face higher compliance costs without ITC
relief.
·
A dairy company
like Amul cannot claim ITC on plastic packaging or cold storage equipment,
impacting margins on low-taxed products.
·
Large players may
absorb costs due to economies of scale, but smaller firms may struggle or pass
costs to consumers.
Renewable
Energy and Sustainability:
·
Manufacturers of
electric vehicles (EVs), solar cookers, and renewable energy devices (retained
at or moved to 5% GST).
·
Inputs like
batteries, semiconductors, and steel (taxed at 18%) result in non-recoverable
taxes, increasing production costs for EV and solar equipment manufacturers.
·
Service
providers in renewable energy (e.g., installation services) face similar ITC
restrictions if outputs are low-taxed.
·
An EV
manufacturer like Tata Motors cannot claim ITC on battery components, raising
vehicle costs despite the 5% GST rate.
·
Government
incentives for green energy or partial ITC relaxations could alleviate pressures.
Textile and
Apparel (Low-Cost Segment):
·
Manufacturers of
low-cost clothing and footwear (below a certain price threshold, moved to 5%
GST).
·
Inputs like
synthetic fibers, dyes, and stitching machinery are taxed at 18%, but ITC is
restricted for 5%-rated outputs, increasing costs for budget apparel
manufacturers.
·
A small-scale
garment producer cannot claim ITC on fabric or dyeing services, squeezing
margins in a competitive market.
·
Firms may focus
on higher-priced apparel (18% slabs) to avail ITC or seek export markets (where
ITC is allowed for zero-rated exports).
Broader
Implications
·
Margin
Compression: Sectors with restricted ITC face reduced profitability unless they
pass costs to consumers, which may be challenging for essentials due to price sensitivity
·
Supply Chain
Impact: Suppliers of inputs (e.g., packaging, logistics) taxed at 18% may face
demand pressure from downstream businesses unable to claim ITC, affecting their
pricing strategies.
·
Compliance
Burden: Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in these sectors, with limited
resources, may face higher compliance costs to manage ITC restrictions,
potentially discouraging formalization.
·
Rural and MSME
Impact: Sectors like agriculture, dairy, and low-cost textiles, which employ
large rural and MSME workforces, are particularly vulnerable to cost pressures,
potentially affecting rural economies.
Potential Mitigation
Strategies
Government
Interventions:
·
The GST Council
could allow partial ITC for specific inputs critical to zero-rate or 5% slab sectors,
as proposed in some pre-GST 2.0 discussions.
·
Subsidies or
exemptions on key inputs (e.g., APIs for medicines, steel for tractors) could
reduce cost pressures.
·
Firms can
diversify into taxable segments (18% slabs) to utilize ITC, e.g., a dairy company
producing premium ice cream (18%) alongside milk (0%).
·
Larger firms may
absorb costs through operational efficiencies or negotiate bulk discounts with
suppliers.
·
Where feasible,
businesses may pass costs to consumers, though this is limited for essentials
due to demand elasticity.
·
Sectors like
textiles and EVs can leverage zero-rated exports to claim ITC on inputs,
mitigating domestic cost pressures.
Conclusions:
GST
2.0 may not help in incrementally higher EPS for corporate India
Overall, GST
2.0 reform may turn out to be GST Chaos 2.0, like GST 1.0 during 2017-18:
·
Overall GST structure
is still very complex, with luxury rates (popcorn tax) for the same goods &
services based on price & quality
·
The issue of
non-availability of ITC for most of the goods & services under 5% and 0%
GST rate may increase the cost of producers as they can’t reimburse potential
higher GST paid on input raw materials and services; thus they have to increase
prices or absorb higher costs, something which may not be good for Dalal Street
(lower profit) and also Main Street (higher costs).
·
An overall
chaotic system may increase the cost of compliance burden of MSMEs, leading to the
financial viability of their business and the eventual closing down.
·
Although there
would be some consumption boost for automobiles, consumer durables, etc,
overall it may be quite limited due to weak labor/job market, already higher
cost of living, and cautious Banks/NBFCs to extend consumer loans due to rising
NPA/delinquency issues.
·
Also, automobile
sales in big tire one/two/three cities are facing various other issues,
including E20 fuel blending, higher cost to maintain personal cars, etc.
·
The issue of
compensation for various goods & services already in the market, the rate
of which would be reduced from existing levels
·
The government
may do the GST reform better by keeping only two rates (10% and 15%), averaging
around 12.50% with full ITC rather than pretending it as a vote bank tool
(consumers ahead of various state elections), which actually will help note
bank (producers) in hiking prices before the 2029 general election.
·
Overall
probabilities of full-scale transmission of any real GST rate cuts to the real
economy would be negligible.
Technical outlook: Nifty Future and Bank Nifty Future
Looking
ahead, whatever may be the narrative, technically Nifty
Future (CMP: 24842) now has to sustain over 25100 for a recovery to
25250/25400-25500/2525800 and a further rally to 26000 and 26100/26300-26400/26500;
otherwise, sustaining below 25050/25000-24900/24800, Nifty Future may again
fall to 24600/24500-24400/24300 and 24000 and 23600/23350*-23900/23750 and
23400*/23100-22600/22200 and further 22000-21700* the coming days.